Talk:Texas/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Accepted Review, please allow me 48 hours to review and give feedback on the article and determine whether or not this article should be promoted. You may contact me on my talk page with any questions or comments. Pursey ^{Talk | Contribs} 21:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I have completed the Good Article review for Texas. Please consider reviewing another article under nomination yourself!

• The contributors to this article have listened carefully to the advice given in their last GA Review, as well as in their Peer Review. The talk page is being used frequently and you're taking the advice and improving the article.
• Images are used correctly with ALT Text and Captions. Well done.
• Could not find any instances of weasel words, and contractions are not being used. The lead is well written and the overall tone of the article is great.
• I'm satisfied that the article is written from a Neutral Point of View and there's no Original Research.
• The articled is now referenced to a high degree. There's an abundance of references from reliable sources.
• I'm reminded of the GA Review I did for Manchester. Keep this up and you're on the road to FA Status.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article has PASSED all the criteria, and I will now promote the article. 23:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)