Talk:Tetuin
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 February 2026. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rewrite following AfD
[edit]During the deletion debate for this article it became apparent that its original identification was probably an error (understandable in 1959) and therefore the identity of tetuin is more complicated than that of most flavonoids. I've attempted to summarise the situation with some citations. The original AfD is at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tetuin.
I ran into an enormous problem that I couldn't track down the original 1959 Mehta & Mehta article, even as a mere contents-page. The Indian Chemical Society, whose Journal featured the original work, are missing 1959 on their website (see "Publications" tab at ) and if they haven't got it, I can't see who would? This put me in two minds about how to report it; I don't feel happy citing something of which I haven't read even the title, but it's necessary to tell the reader where the whole story began. Elemimele (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)