Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26082a9b8821709

Jump to content

Talk:Terminator Salvation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTerminator Salvation has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 30, 2005Articles for deletionDeleted
December 4, 2005Articles for deletionNo consensus
January 22, 2006Articles for deletionNo consensus
March 24, 2006Articles for deletionDeleted
June 19, 2006Articles for deletionDeleted
January 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Too Long

[edit]

Greetings Wikipedians! I can tell that much effort has been expended on this article. But it strikes me as much too long for such an undistinguished film. The Plot section has 643 words, almost as many as the Plot of Gone With The Wind (688 words) and Lawrence of Arabia (706). Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP:SOFIXIT? DonIago (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@DonIago Done! I have endeavored to condense the plot section without losing the key points. Regards, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Typo in lead

[edit]

Why was my edit reverted? "serving as a sequel to" makes more grammatical sense than "serving as sequel to" Elspooky (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

That was me, and I self-reverted my edit as it was a mis-click. DonIago (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

uhh

[edit]

"In 2020, following the critical and commercial failures of the two subsequent films"

this statement isn't even remotely accurate. Dark Fate was the third best reviewed film in the series. 2603:9001:2F0:8D30:6E56:5051:D0E0:4D4 (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Noting sources from removed statement

[edit]

I have removed a poorly constructed and poorly sourced sentence about figures who publicly defended Bale's on-source outburst. In case anyone wants to write a new, accurate account from those sources, I am recording them here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7871743.stm and https://ew.com/tv/sharon-stone-defends-christian-bale-over-famous-outburst-on-terminator-set/

Additionally, I am planning on moving the paragraph about the outburst from the buried "controversies" section, which appears misplaced and is in any case discouraged by Wikipedia style, to the "filming" section, where is properly belongs. Perhaps publicists had a hand in both of these elements that I'm touching here. ~2026-32199-46 (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Terminator Salvation: The Final Battle redirect

[edit]

Terminator Salvation: The Final Battle currently redirects here, specifically to the #Tie-ins section. Would there be any objection if we changed it to redirect to List of Terminator comics#Terminator_Salvation:_The_Final_Battle_(2013–2014) instead? There's a bit more information about it on that page. - Kylara (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply