Talk:Terminator Salvation
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Terminator Salvation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Terminator Salvation has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Too Long
[edit]Greetings Wikipedians! I can tell that much effort has been expended on this article. But it strikes me as much too long for such an undistinguished film. The Plot section has 643 words, almost as many as the Plot of Gone With The Wind (688 words) and Lawrence of Arabia (706). Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- WP:SOFIXIT? DonIago (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- @DonIago Done! I have endeavored to condense the plot section without losing the key points. Regards, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Typo in lead
[edit]Why was my edit reverted? "serving as a sequel to" makes more grammatical sense than "serving as sequel to" Elspooky (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was me, and I self-reverted my edit as it was a mis-click. DonIago (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
uhh
[edit]"In 2020, following the critical and commercial failures of the two subsequent films"
this statement isn't even remotely accurate. Dark Fate was the third best reviewed film in the series. 2603:9001:2F0:8D30:6E56:5051:D0E0:4D4 (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Noting sources from removed statement
[edit]I have removed a poorly constructed and poorly sourced sentence about figures who publicly defended Bale's on-source outburst. In case anyone wants to write a new, accurate account from those sources, I am recording them here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7871743.stm and https://ew.com/tv/sharon-stone-defends-christian-bale-over-famous-outburst-on-terminator-set/
Additionally, I am planning on moving the paragraph about the outburst from the buried "controversies" section, which appears misplaced and is in any case discouraged by Wikipedia style, to the "filming" section, where is properly belongs. Perhaps publicists had a hand in both of these elements that I'm touching here. ~2026-32199-46 (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Terminator Salvation: The Final Battle redirect
[edit]Terminator Salvation: The Final Battle currently redirects here, specifically to the #Tie-ins section. Would there be any objection if we changed it to redirect to List of Terminator comics#Terminator_Salvation:_The_Final_Battle_(2013–2014) instead? There's a bit more information about it on that page. - Kylara (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- GA-Class New Mexico articles
- Unknown-importance New Mexico articles
- WikiProject New Mexico articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors


