Talk:Teodorico Ranieri
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Archbishop of Pisa ??
[edit](Cardinal) Stefano Borgia, Memorie istoriche della pontifizia città di Benevento, Parte terza, Volume primo (Roma 1769), pp. 256-257 demonstrates that he was not Elect of Pisa, or Archbishop of Pisa, but Elect of Panormus. Pisa was a printing error in Ughelli, that was unthinkingly copied and recopied all the way down to.... well, Wikipedia. Vicedomino (talk) 06:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw the comment that it was a printing error in Ughelli. Cardinal Borgia was diligent, but wrong. Teoderico was archbishop-elect. Matthaeius (Mattei), Antonius (1772). Ecclesiae Pisanae historia (in Latin). Vol. Tomus II. Venturini. p. 51. Cappelletti, Giuseppe (1861). Le chiese d'Italia (in Italian). Vol. Tomo decimosesto (16). Venezia: G. Antonelli. p. 146. Eubel, Conradus (ed.) (1913). Hierarchia catholica (in Latin). Vol. Tomus I (second ed.). Münster: Libreria Regensbergiana. p. 12 no. 8.
{{cite book}}:|first1=has generic name (help)
- I withdraw the comment that it was a printing error in Ughelli. Cardinal Borgia was diligent, but wrong. Teoderico was archbishop-elect. Matthaeius (Mattei), Antonius (1772). Ecclesiae Pisanae historia (in Latin). Vol. Tomus II. Venturini. p. 51. Cappelletti, Giuseppe (1861). Le chiese d'Italia (in Italian). Vol. Tomo decimosesto (16). Venezia: G. Antonelli. p. 146. Eubel, Conradus (ed.) (1913). Hierarchia catholica (in Latin). Vol. Tomus I (second ed.). Münster: Libreria Regensbergiana. p. 12 no. 8.
Contradiction
[edit]
The article states: "He was then made a cardinal in December of that year, and in 1300 until his death was the Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church." The wiki link cited informs the reader that he was Chamberlain from ca. 1295 to 1299. It also states that Teodorico was archbishop of Pisa. He was only archbishop-elect. See: Matthaeius (Mattei), Antonius (1772). Ecclesiae Pisanae historia (in Latin). Vol. Tomus II. Venturini. pp. 50–52.