Talk:Tenzing Montes
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by JorisvS in topic Confusion over Tombaugh Regio(n) naming
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tenzing Montes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Confusion over Tombaugh Regio(n) naming
[edit]I recently edited this article to correct what I believed to be a mistake, as the article referred to both 'Tombaugh Regio' and 'Tombaugh Region'. I believed 'Tombaugh Regio' to be the currently accepted name for the region. I am happy to be told otherwise, I would just like to know the current thinking on this. Liquidizer3 (talk) 22:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- You're right about that. Sorry for forgetting to keep that. --JorisvS (talk) 09:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)