Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245e7d6091197fe

Jump to content

Talk:Tenentism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 78.154.15.163 in topic Lede

I don't have much wiki protocol under my belt, but I should say that the article on tenentes is a great start, but without much substance.

I think it's fair to ask for more citations and original quotations. Something I've looked at recently^ references a detailed tenentes manifesto written by civilian Alberto Torres in 1932 and entitled, "Esboco do programa revolucionario de reconstrucao politica e social do Brasil." The author goes into great depth detailing the concerns over centralization of government, nationalism, the end of the latifundios system, progressive economic and social policies, as well as traditional concerns over the separation of church and state and freedom of the press. Discussion of these ideals and policy prescriptions would be appreciated, as well as their sources. Additionally, I think the article (again, which is great) would benefit from changing the language a bit to clear away colloquialisms.

Finally, there is something to be noted in the intensely personal and dramatic politics of the tenentes, especially during the failed coups of 1922 and '24, and the Long March of '24-'27 (which predates Mao!). Much can be argued in favor of the tenentes for appealing to the rural poor in support of nationalist politics. Men like Vargas would use this to their advantage for sooth.

Anywho, food for thought. Now I'll see if I can't get this squiggly line to work right...

^

128.12.89.6 11:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lede

[edit]

If it was 'a political philosophy', it should be explained in the lede what is key ideas and stances were. 78.154.15.163 (talk) 08:24, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply