Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I propose to merge Temple Butte Limestone into Temple Butte Formation. These are two pages about exactly the same stratigraphic unit and have the same scope. Judging from current usage in the literature and it beng composed of predominantly dolomite or sandy dolomite, the Temple Butte Formation is the preferred name for the merged article. I think that the content in the Temple Butte Limestone article can easily be incorporated with a minimum of editing in the context of Temple Butte Formation, and the Temple Butte Formation article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Temple Butte Limestone will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Paul H. (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply