Talk:Telus Digital

No longer wholly owned

1/6/2016 4:12:52 AM

TELUS Closes TELUS International Transaction With Baring Private Equity Asia

Vancouver, B.C. - TELUS announced today the closing of the previously-announced transaction whereby Baring Private Equity Asia is acquiring a 35 per cent stake in TELUS International...

• https://www.telusinternational.com/articles/news-telus-announces-baring-private-equity-asia-acquire-35-percent-stake-telus-international/
• http://www.lexpert.ca/article/telus-closes-telus-international-transaction-with-baring-private-equity-asia/?p=14%7C119
• http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/news-sources/?mid=ccnm.20160505.201605051053480003
• http://about.telus.com/community/english/news_centre/news_releases/blog/2016/06/01/telus-closes-telus-international-transaction-with-baring-private-equity-asia
• http://www.marketwatch.com/story/telus-closes-telus-international-transaction-with-baring-private-equity-asia-2016-06-01-6160612
• http://www.morningstar.com/news/benzinga/BenzBZW_8054134/telus-closes-transaction-with-baring-private-equity-asia.html

--Triccer (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Implications and Criticism of Outsourcing

I've removed the section below. It's not about Telus. --Duncan (talk) 20:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Implications and Criticism of Outsourcing' Outsourcing, especially offshoring, always comes under scrutiny, mainly due to job displacement. Outsourcing supporters draw on mainstream economics to make the business case. However, the use of mainstream economic logic does not address the ethical questions thus raised.

Overall, companies are expanding offshore operations through both captive and third-party models. Over the last several years, call center and customer service outsourcing has spread from India and other early adopting geographies into a number of emerging markets like Eastern Europe, Central America, and other locations, mostly due to evolving business needs of large, multinational companies.

Large consulting and analyst firms often cover outsourcing as a main topic, providing updates on the current state of outsourcing:

• Datamonitor
• Everest Group
• Gartner
• Forrester Research

References

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• TELUS International Office BG.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

• TELUS International Office BG2.png
• Telus-mckinley-rainbow-lights.jpg
• Voxpro Office.png

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

TELUS Digital rebranding

TELUS International has rebranded to TELUS Digital; I've been doing my best to rework the article for the rebrand (including moving the article to the new name!) but I want to make sure this all gets done properly, I don't edit Wikipedia much. Segin (talk) 18:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Request to remove promotional content banner

Paid contributor disclosure: I am employed by TELUS Digital and have a financial conflict of interest with this article. Per WP:PAID, I am not editing the article directly and am posting this request for review by an uninvolved autoconfirmed editor.

Specific request

Change: {{Advert|date=September 2024}}

To: (remove this line entirely)

Reasoning

The banner has been on the article since September 2024. The banner cites promotional language, inappropriate external links, and lack of a neutral point of view. The current article addresses each:

1. Promotional language. The Lead, History, Services, and Social responsibility sections describe what TELUS Digital does and has participated in, rather than asserting quality, leadership, or impact. Claims about the company are attributed to outside coverage using hedged phrasing such as "Analyst coverage has evaluated," "media coverage has documented," and "local reporting has highlighted," rather than presented as fact in Wikipedia's voice.

1. Inappropriate external links. Body prose uses internal wikilinks to related entities and inline citations to third-party sources. There are no embedded links to company-owned marketing pages, product pages, or press kits in the prose.

1. Neutral point of view. Citations across the History, Services, and Social responsibility sections rely on independent third-party publications, including major business and technology outlets (Reuters, Bloomberg) and regional news coverage from the markets where the company operates. Company-issued press releases are not used as standalone support for claims about the company.

If specific passages still warrant cleanup, I am willing to identify additional independent sources to support targeted rewrites rather than the page-wide tag.

Dmm123456789 (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Replied here (banner removed). — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 01:25, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Reply 22-JUN-2026

  Please consult assigning editor  

• It is recommended that, as a courtesy, you first try asking the editor who assigned the template — in this case Stickguy — in order to find out from them if it can be removed. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether or not the issues which caused its placement have been corrected. You may contact them directly by placing a new message on their talk page.
• In the unlikely event that you do not hear back from them after a reasonable amount of time, please reopen this request by altering the {{Edit COI}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=y to |ans=n.

Regards,  Spintendo  20:19, 22 June 2026 (UTC)