Talk:Ted Verity
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Character Assignations of Two Princesses
[edit]Why does your paper seek to destroy high profile women who stand up to a corrupt institution inside the Monarchy? Diana is dead and Meghan was in the verge of a mental breakdown.
Enough is enough! I do not blame Harry and Meghan for escaping that dreadful life of tabloid newspaper harassment! You are like a nest of vipers always looking for dirt because dirt and corruption sells newspapers.
Why don’t you leave Harry and Meghan alone? They left the UK. Prince Andrew us one you need to feast on. Talk about a dirt bag! Do some digging in the Royal family on the topic of sex trafficking. That will yield some good dirty new stories to last awhile!
Can Harry and Meghan oay their respects and return to their hideaway in the U.S.? They have ti hide here too. So sad! Harry never asked to be a prince. He gave it all up for a woman who understood him and loves him. Leave them alone! 208.67.101.25 (talk) 00:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is not the talk page of Ted Verity or the Daily Mail…
- That being said, I personally am all for leaving Markle and Windsor alone… I'm not even buying Harry's book. Oh, wait, they don't want that privacy. jae (talk) 20:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- I heard that in he beginning the DM would state they don't print bad stories about Harry and Maghan every day of the year. It's just so happened that the year they started it was a leap year and someone forgot to get the extra bad press day story. 62.64.131.29 (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Neutral tone
[edit]I have reverted the recent addition of some content as per WP:NPOV. The content did not have a neutral encyclopedic tone and is WP:UNDUE weight for the lead section as per WP:LEAD. Guidelines at WP:BLP state: Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively.
I have reverted the following content below:
His editorship is primarily focussed on destroying Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. His editorship has provided thousands of articles attacking her; most of which are completely made up.
I feel this content should not be reinstated to the biography unless there is a clear consensus of multiple editors on this talk page that it can be included in the article. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)