Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229808889efcf80

Jump to content

Talk:Ted Sundquist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Demiurge1000 in topic Vandalism??

Question

[edit]

Did Ted Sundquist write this himself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.186.130 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC) No, it was a collaborated revision from his linked in, website, facebook, twitter, his resume, and numerous sited articles written and sited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jillian.Ricard (talkcontribs) 00:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

"improving the flow"

[edit]

Reverting four different changes made for four different reasons is not "improving the flow". Please explain why each of the changes was reverted? Sergeant Cribb (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The changes made were reverted by Ravens, not by myself or lauramparsons. Ravens is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jillian.Ricard (talkcontribs) 00:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC) Reply
This is the reversion I'm referring to, made by Lauramparsons (talk · contribs). Sergeant Cribb (talk) 06:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

A book deal.

[edit]

Apparently, "Sundquist will release his first book June 7, 2013 titled Taking Your Team to the Top: How to Build and Manage Great Teams like the Pros.". Should we include this material in the article, phrased exactly like that? Or not? Opinions welcome. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism??

[edit]

I don't understand why my page updates keep getting reverted or flagged as vandalism. I greatly improved the look of the infobox and how the references were cited. The only other thing I added was a factual statement: 'Ted is releasing a book'. I also don't understand why that would be seen as either spam, or shameless promotion. It is a fact. Ted is releasing a book. Atiffany (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC) AtiffanyReply

The book is not on sale yet. When the book is on sale, it might be possible to include it in the article; if reliable independent sources discuss it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply