Talk:Ted Genoways

Possible additional source for Controversy section

At the help desk a reader posting as an IP, suggested https://www.readthehook.com/66869/cover-tale-woe-death-vqrs-kevin-morrissey as a source. I have looked at this briefly, not in detail. It looks to me as if it might be an WP:RS, but how much we would wish to add to an already sizable section without falling afoul of WP:UNDUE is a question. DES ^(talk) 20:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

well, "controversy" sections in and of themselves are usually quite inappropriate. WP:STRUCTURE / WP:Controversy sections. Combined with BLP and that the fact that this source too is merely allegations, i have removed reference to the incident from the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:

• Cite templates will be used where possible.
• Tables may be used to organise short stories, poems and/or book reviews.
• I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
• Links to potentially unreliable digitised copies may be removed.

This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 09:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)