Talk:Technology doping
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by CurlingClips in topic Spaghetti racquet
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Technology doping article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Text or other creative content from Controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics#Technology in track cycling was copied or moved into Technology doping with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Re:Attribution
[edit]If the attribution in the edit summary is sufficient the copied template can be removed. 88.88.166.111 (talk) 18:20, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 4 August 2021
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a partial block from editing this page has now been answered. |
In the Vaporfly section, it says "2007" but it should be "2017" according to the linked article at the top of the section. JsfasdF252 (talk) 20:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done: @JsfasdF252: That appears to contradict . The source in the main article is about Nike Zoom Vaporfly Elite, not just Nike Vaporfly. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 12:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Spaghetti racquet
[edit]Does spaghetti racquet qualify as an example of technology doping? CurlingClips (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2025 (UTC)