Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26a833deae8b86e

Jump to content

Talk:Tatwine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review
Good articleTatwine has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 14, 2011Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 30, 2019, July 30, 2022, July 30, 2024, and June 10, 2026.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tatwine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've added a couple, or so, of wikilinks since they help clarify technical terms. It was not worth adding them to a "problem list".

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A short but well referenced article on a historical figure.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Not applicable: - no figures.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Not applicable: - no figures.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on gaining another GA for an Archbishop/Saint. Pyrotec (talk) 12:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply