Talk:Tango Gameworks

Reduce cites

Basic factual statements like "Tango Gameworks' first game was formally teased in April 2012 under the codename Zwei" only need a single citation, maybe two if you want one as backup. I'd pick the ref that goes into the fact in the most depth and remove the rest (four+ refs is overkill for non-controversial facts).  czar 16:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Czar: I can't seem to find a source covering the rebrand Tango [K.K.] -> Tango Gameworks, though it is mentioned on their website ("After being merged with ZeniMax Asia K.K., the studio is rebranded as Tango Gameworks."). Any idea on how to resolve this? Lordtobi (✉) 16:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Better to not mention it at all if it wasn't important enough to be covered in a secondary source. (Technical aspects like company legal name changes and specific dates are usually not worth the space in the article anyway—usually extraneous when writing for a general audience.) czar 16:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

So the short coverage that it was Tango K.K. "in 2010" in the infobox is sufficient? Should we use the website as 'source' for this or is just the claim sufficient? Lordtobi (✉) 16:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Ghostwire Tokyo

I know that someone somewhere said that this game was tied to the MCU. MPedits (talk) 20:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

You know the drill, provide a source and its in. Lordtobi (✉) 20:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)