Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2437a2fb8ad8020

Jump to content

Talk:Tamils

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by ~2026-71959-9 in topic Claim about language longevity
Former featured articleTamils is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 24, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
January 7, 2007Featured article reviewKept
December 29, 2015Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Tissamaharama Tamil Brahmi inscription

[edit]

Presently scholars identify this as a Brahmi inscription and not a Tamil Brahmi Inscription. Read the article Tissamaharama inscription No. 53. Sources:
(1) Falk, H. (2014). Owners’ Graffiti on Pottery from Tissamaharama. Zeitschrift für Archäologie Aussereuropäischer Kulturen. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag. pp.45-94
(2) Dias, M. (2021). The South Indian ascendancy depicted in the Tamil inscriptions in Sri Lanka from the 3rd century BCE to 12th century ACE. Ancient Ceylon. No.27. pp.43-58. -- L Manju (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

No not all presently scholars identify this as brahmi inscription. Some identify this as Tamil Brahmi inscription. You first read the article you mentioned, out of 5 scholars, 3 identify it as Tamil brahmi. So your statement is not correct that presently scholars identify this as brahmi not Tamil brahmi. Ranithraj (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Genetics of Tamils

[edit]

I am not sure why this is not being discussed MuhammadRaymen01 (talk) 06:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Claim about language longevity

[edit]

The following sentence contains some factual information, but it is misleading in its current phrasing:

"Tamil is one of the longest-surviving languages, with over two thousand years of written history, dating back to the Sangam period (between 300 BCE and 300 CE)."

Specifically, claiming that any living language survived/existed more or less time than any other living language is scientifically unsound. Every language is gradually dervived from an older language, and all existing languages ultimately trace back their existance (and survival) to pre-historic times, that we have no way to measure scientifically. In other words, the language encoded by the writings in the Sangam period has the same relationship with contemporary Tamil that contemporary French or Italian have with Latin writings from 300 BCE to 300 CE.

The addition of such gratuitous claims to a page dedicated to an ethnicity does not add any value to the article, and it risks fueling chauvinistic sentiments and racial tensions for no other reasons that stating the obvious in a tendentious way regarding some very ancient and cool writings. ~2026-71959-9 (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply