Talk:Tails Adventure
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
 | Tails Adventure has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 5, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
 | The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Translate from Español
[edit]I decided to be bold and translate the Spanish Wiki's intro to English. It's a little rough, but with a little help it can be fine. --SonicChao talk 16:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Reception
[edit]Does anybody know about this game's reception? I feel that the article is incomplete without it. - Up and over for a six! (talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Reception about this game is absent from the internet. Formerly Codename Colorado | The Earwig (User | Talk | Contributions) 03:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tails Adventure/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Shall review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Development and release
[edit]- The North American release date need to have its citation needed tag addressed in the prose and the infobox
Reception
[edit]- " Mean Machines Sega agreed, calling it "decidedly unoriginal" and," - From my perspective, it appears that there is something missing from this section of text. If so, please rectify it
- "1UP.com called Tails Adventures and Tails Skypatrol" - Adventure
References
[edit]- Perhaps you could consider archiving References 3 and 13 like you have done with the other online sources
Overall, a beautifully written article. Only a few minor nit picks prevent an automatic promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- @MWright96: Thank you. I fixed all items. TarkusABtalk 12:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @TarkusAB: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)