Talk:TEM-function
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by 212.45.83.5 in topic The references
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The references
[edit]There papers by the creator of the article gave cause for concern since they are the sole references. I have no strong feelings about deletion/retention of this article since it also advertises the main author of all three papers Fiddle Faddle 07:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- The method is not widely accepted. In fact, it only relies on couple of papers from the same author. Nowadays, everyone who writes papers can publish articles on wikipedia on their methods. In my opinion only methods confirmed by majority deserve being published here.
- The same author also promotes concepts like Lak wettability index. But neither TEM function, nor Lak wettability index can be found on any single petrophysics book.
- There are a lot of similar methods from different authors that are used much more widely. For example USBM wettability index, Amott wettability index, Washburn method, etc. 212.45.83.5 (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)