Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a258f10c5e7ae88e

Jump to content

Talk:TAT Technologies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AndyTheGrump in topic Updating
[edit]

Here an IP removed the "See also" link to Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II. Per this press release from July of last year, the link is relevant to the context of the article. At the time of the press release it wasn't fully clear that Israel would go ahead with the proposal to acquire F-35s, for a variety of reasons. But as was covered in the news as recently as last week, indications are that the first shipment of F-35s will arrive in Israel in 2015. I'm therefore restoring the link.—Biosketch (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the link, given that regardless of whether Israel has F-35s or not (they do), we'd need to show that TAT Technologies was significantly involved. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Updating

[edit]

I've updated the article somewhat, correcting current location and CEO. We could do with more though, e.g. clarification as to whether the company is still listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, and more recent performance figures.

Any updates need to be properly sourced (with independent sourcing for anything remotely promotional looking), and in conformity with WP:NPOV policy. And for the benefit for anyone from the company reading this see WP:COI and WP:PAID. Per recent reverts, this isn't a platform for free advertising. We don't care about company 'missions', and nor do we care if the company considers itself 'a global force' , or whether it considers itself 'a foundation of transparency, integrity, and long-term value creation'. If you want to bore people to death with vacuous marketing-speak, find a website that will let you do so for a fee. Wikipedia attempts to present itself as an encyclopaedia, and while it clearly doesn't always succeed, it at least makes a token effort. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply