Talk:Systematica Investments

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

ref bombing

@SunDawn and Imcdc:, ok, so does it actually take eight sources to confirm the following? Graywalls (talk) 02:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I do agree that the use of too much references to cover that particular statement can be reduced. In my opinion, this article stands well alone without the refbombing on that particular statement. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm not privileged to see subscription only Bloomberg stuff, but I am concerned if these investment management company articles meeting NCORP. For the purpose of NCORP, multiple articles by same journalist, or same publisher counts as one.. and I did notice a trend of these investment management type articles having the similar type of cite bombing to repeatedly confirm the same contents that do not require all the references to verify. Graywalls (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

It has been fixed. Imcdc Contact 12:43, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

In January 2015, BlueTrend was spun off as Systematica Investments which would use computers to mine large data sets to find investment opportunities along with algorithmic trading techniques. It would be controlled by Braga and her team although BlueCrest would still have a 49% stake in it. At the time, the firm had around 8.4 billion in assets under management (AUM) and 100 employees . Systematica's flagship fund was named Systematica BlueTrend