Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a227cfc92e258682

Jump to content

Talk:Syncona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cucina11 in topic Added information

Added information

[edit]

@Seraphimblade: What of the three pieces of information in my edit you consider "spam" and why? And what not? Thanks in advance for your objective feedback.

1) "With a Figure of 1.4 billion market capitalisation considered to be UK's largest life science fund" - based on Citywire source

2) "It holds investments in Freeline, Achilles Therapeutics, Autolus and Anaveon" - with Citywire source

3) "and it founded Resolution (cell therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease) and Purespring (gene therapy)" - based on Citywire source --

Cucina11 (talk) 17:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yep, exactly that. Standard "look how neat they are" type puff. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's been a while I just came back to this. You really seem to have overreacted here. And didn't answer my question at all. 2) and 3) are neither positive nor negative , but just a pure description of what they do. 1) is a positive statement, but should it not be mentioned in Wikipedia at all which is the largest life science fund (according to an independent source) at all? Just because it is positive? Should there also be no mentioning that Kylian Mbappé is World Champion in football, because it's "look how neat I am"? Cucina11 (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply