Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a262e74b7bd8b6ed

Jump to content

Talk:Swiss Leaks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Kontrollinski in topic Prosecution of banking crimes should be in article

February 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm trying to improve the article but I don't know how to do it. So I'll put links that can improve it if you want to help me, please:

They are in "Complaints of journalism in Spain due of the lack of this investigation in tabloids and public broadcaster" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swiss_Leaks&oldid=646490271#Complaints_of_journalism_in_Spain_due_the_treatment_of_this_information

Thank you (I'm a newbie here) ;-P Regards.--Pantuflo (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I can't help you for the moment? Why don't you start an article about the event in the Spanish Wikipedia? Take care to stick to sources and do not add interpretation of informaiton by yourself to articles. This would harm the reputation of Wikipedia in the end.Luxsarl (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Seems like you're trying to address a completely different subject (journalism in Spain and its perceived shortcomings) using this article as a coatrack... --Randykitty (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
No, no, sorry, I only tried to relate that the treatment of an info itself could become a relevant fact (for example) and it could be relevant in many articles (or not). I'm a newcomer here, and my english is horrible hahah... :-P Edit: I've read WP:RECENTISM about recent articles in Wikipedia, It is useful before editing, better I'll edit other less recent articles, thanks. :-) --Pantuflo (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Prosecution of banking crimes should be in article

[edit]

“So you might ask, what’s the appropriate financial penalty for a bank in HSBC’s position? Exactly how much money should one extract from a firm that has been shamelessly profiting from business with criminals for years and years? Remember, we’re talking about a company that has admitted to a smorgasbord of serious banking crimes. If you’re the prosecutor, you’ve got this bank by the balls. So how much money should you take?

How about all of it? How about every last dollar the bank has made since it started its illegal activity? How about you dive into every bank account of every single executive involved in this mess and take every last bonus dollar they’ve ever earned? Then take their houses, their cars, the paintings they bought at Sotheby’s auctions, the clothes in their closets, the loose change in the jars on their kitchen counters, every last freaking thing. Take it all and don’t think twice. And then throw them in jail.

Sound harsh? It does, doesn’t it? The only problem is, that’s exactly what the government does just about every day to ordinary people involved in ordinary drug cases.”  Preceding unsigned comment added by Kontrollinski (talkcontribs) 10:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply