Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
[[River Thames#Physical and natural aspects|Physical and Natural Aspects of the River Thames]] The anchor (#Physical and natural aspects) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As a geographical feature it's reasonable to expect that people will want to go and see it, so if it's shown on reliable maps as "Back Water" then that ought to be mentioned in the article.
What the Ordnance Survey have said (reference?) they may do in the future isn't relevant. Louis Knee (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
The waterway is *a* backwater, but it is known locally as the "Swift Ditch" and has been for centuries. Asking a local resident the way to the Back Water of the river Thames, would probably elicit the response "which one?".--TedColes (talk) 07:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply