Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245edb659e02877

Jump to content

Talk:Sweet chestnut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Chiswick Chap in topic About distribution

Why "retiform" and not "reticuliform" bark of the sweet chestnut

[edit]

Latin for "net" is rete and anything "net-shaped" is retiform. Reticulum means "little net or net-shaped bag", even "network". So, why complicate matters and use the convoluted form reticuliform when all you want to say is "net-shaped" and not "shaped like a little net or bag"?. It would be plainly wrong, in fact. Dieter Simon 22:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • What's the deal with this very unencyclopedic sentence pair "The bark often has an unmistakable, yet beautifully net-shaped (retiform) pattern...."? Wouldn't something like "The bark often has a{n unmistakable,} net-shaped (retiform) pattern with deep furrows or fissures running spirally in both directions up the trunk." The way it is sounds like it was pulled directly from a guidebook of the Mediterranean. It should be descriptive, not evocative.24.6.2.72 20:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
What's the deal indeed! Have changed the section relating to the bark. Thanks for drawing attention to the unencyclopaedic style. Dieter Simon 00:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

capitalization?

[edit]

Why is it rendered "Sweet Chestnut" and not "sweet chestnut"? -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

cultivation

[edit]

Why not improve this article with information on how chestnuts are commercially farmed? Are commercial strains available and do they use rootstocks? How does the industry work? --ChrisJMoor 02:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image of "sweet chestnut forest"

[edit]

Hi, Yzmo, can you please rotate your photo of "Sweet chestnut forest" so the tree is standing up at least? Many thanks. Dieter Simon 23:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Japan

[edit]

Chestnuts are popular in Japan too, but is it the same type?Andycjp 05:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image of "Distribution map"

[edit]

The distribution map marks areas in brown(ish) and green. Yet there's no legend explaining what the colors actually mean.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.228.7.74 (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 03:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


Castanea sativaSweet chestnutWP:COMMONNAME Kolano123 (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

About distribution

[edit]

'In some European countries, C. sativa has only been introduced recently, for example in Slovakia or the Netherlands' Does this talk about use in forestry or other production uses? Because it's said the ancient Tomans introduced Castanea Sativa in the Netherlands Bosbouwerd (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a reliable source for that? Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply