Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2238bd449cd1210

Jump to content

Talk:Sweet Violets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by ABriskFantasia in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

I know it is old, but is it a copyright violation to have the lyrics in full here? Laconic 16:29, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, posting the lyrics from 1951 is a copyright violation. I have removed the lyrics. serendipitousstl (email) 18:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The edit described by serendipitousstl seems not to have occurred (perhaps he forgot to save), but I agree that it should have. I have removed the full lyrics, but included a short excerpt in the article text to demonstrate the style of the song. --DavidK93 (talk) 10:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not an experienced enough Wikipedia editor to know how to best do this, but it seems important to note it: the "Not to be confused" line at the top of the page seems to refer to the same song. The section of the page for "My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean" that describes "Sweet Violets" as a parody mentions the same Roud number. It seems clear to me that, given the number of different recordings and the added influence of the Emmet musical, this song should have its own page and not only be mentioned on the "My Bonnie" page, but I don't know what's the right way to combine the information. ABriskFantasia (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply