Talk:Swanson
Add topic | Swanson received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Swanson Broths
[edit]It should be noted that Campbell Soup still holds Swanson's broth products. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuel Curtis (talk • contribs) 14:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Swanson Brands
[edit]Swanson Article is disorganized, I (b64) have edited the Page to look like this. Carlossuarez46 wants it to look like it does now. What does the group think?
Thanks B64 (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Removal of references and interwiki links is never appropriate. Edit warring without consensus is also not appropriate. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
"World War II" section has nullifyingly inconsistent time frame
[edit]The "World War II" section states that during the war, which ended in 1945, women who had joined the work force had less time for meal preparation for their children, but then goes on saying that post-war, a time presumably beginning in late 1945, women began to rely on TV Dinners — which the article later states were introduced years later, in 1953. How did a product introduced in 1953 have ANY bearing on conditions during a war that ended in 1945? It would therefore seem that this entire section has nothing sensible to say, and really should just be deleted! 2601:541:880:38C0:EC3F:CD69:AD54:B7A6 (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)