Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24579de6aa422ce

Jump to content

Talk:Sur La Table

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Piledhigheranddeeper in topic Early history?

Pronunciation

[edit]

Can someone please explain the proper pronunciation of Sur La Table within the article? Sur la tahb, etc.? jengod 19:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

That's a good question. I've never seen a source on it, and it's really an English-language use of a French phrase, so I tend to hear sur la tahb. But I don't know if the company has an official stance. -- Scarequotes 19:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Internally they use the proper French pronunciation (as outlined above). Some customers pronounce it that way, others pronounce it "'sir lah tah-bleh, while others pronounce it "sir lah tay-bull". They don't 'correct' the various pronunciations; as noted it's a French phrase used in the U.S., and they're not snobs about it.

Sur La Table does not have an official stance on the pronunciation of its name but employees are more than happy to help customers learn the proper pronunciation. In fact, Sur La Table employee's most frequently asked question may well be “how do you pronounce your name and what does it mean?” /sir lah taab-leh/ French for “on the table”.

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by ReeBecki (talkcontribs) 22:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The correct pronunciation is sir lah taab-leh but the leh is very soft someone should change it64.111.50.222 (talk) 02:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fixed! Grendzy (talk) 00:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sources pulled from the article

[edit]

These sources were in the footer of the article, so they should either be included in the body or removed.

Thanks. tedder (talk) 03:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Early history?

[edit]

The "History" section of this article has one sentence set in 1972. The next sentence is in 1995, and the sentence after that is in 2005. Thirty-three years in three sentences, while there are three paragraphs about 2020. There needs to be more about the first three decades of this company's existence (preferably not parroted from its website). --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply