Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a238b8008b83cf70

Jump to content

Talk:Suphalak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Paul 012 in topic Misleading original research

Misleading original research

[edit]

This is not a breed. There's only one surviving alleged specimen, and our sources tell us someone tried to establish a breed from it, and failed. This is a former landrace that is now essentially extinct.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  20:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

PS: This appears to exist as a WP:COATRACK to promote the organization TIMBA, which is non-notable.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  21:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

2024

[edit]

From what I could find, the position that Suphalak is distinct from Burmese indeed appears to come from people associated with TIMBA. But independent secondary sources have covered their breeding attempts and efforts to register the breed, at least as lately as 2022, so the original research concerns can be remedied by trimming the content down to what has been published. As the article mentions, most other people in Thailand just treat the name as a synonym for Burmese, but it takes the TIMBA's position as fact so that's also an NPOV issue. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply