Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article was nominated for deletion on September 3 2008. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
I created the present article. I do not know whether the persons referred to in the article I have created and the article which was deleted are the same. But, I think the person referred to in my article has sufficient notability for having a page in his name in Wikipedia. If the general consensus is otherwise, I have no objection to deleting the article. Krishnachandranvn (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
It seems quite suspicious to me that any reference to the controversies that the subject has been involved in (which are quite important) are being edited to look more positive. It seems to me that this action is not very objective.
Two suggestions.
-Delete the article altogether. It's not that relevant and it seems like a love letter rather than a Wikipedia article.
-Return the objective view of the controversies and lock the article.
DATrevino (talk) 22:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
