Talk:Suillus collinitus
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Rcej in topic GA Review
 | Suillus collinitus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Suillus collinitus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Nice! Two things:
- In tax, phylo, name, may we have the naming and author mention re the varieties?
- Good idea, done. Sasata (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also, paragraph "According to molecular analysis results published in 1996, S. collinitus is closely related to an isolate of S. granuatus collected from Nepal. This isolate probably represents a species distinct from North American and European isolates, based on morphology and host tree association. In 2006, a phylogenetic analysis of Suillus isolates collected from Spain showed that S. collinitus clustered together with other species "typical of the Mediterranean area", namely S. bellinii, S. luteus, and S. mediterraneensis."
- Clarify what literally the isolate entailed; not getting a 'logistical' understanding of it. Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Reworded, expanded, and linked... better? Sasata (talk) 17:15, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Much better! We pass :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Results of review
[edit]The article Suillus collinitus passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass