Talk:SugarDaddy.com
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Weeb Dingle in topic Delete it.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SugarDaddy.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Delete it.
[edit]This "article" is nothing but a puff piece intended to glorify a commercial site that dangles big promises of the wonders of prostitution. Go to the site, read a few testimonials from "Daddy" and "Baby" alike, and it's inarguable that the "happy users" do not settle down to some sort of quasi-monogamy, but rather claim to have regular and multiple "dates" with various others. FWIW, a whore with one client remains a whore.
The "article" adds nothing, its citation are almost entirely to sites and programs that exist to prey upon the hysteria they whip up, and the website in question smirkingly hides behind a "clean" form of prostitution. I will request that the plug be pulled.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)