Talk:Succinctness
Add topicLatest comment: 2 months ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Speaking of Succinct
[edit]This article is succinct, lol. 71.210.233.228 (talk) 06:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I agree lol and maybe the article being succinct is an example of meta-succinctness, yet another meta-whatever-you-want that I found useful in meta-cognition and meta-emotion, but - wait a second - unfortunately "meta" is a code word and ... since any coding and compression are excluded from the definition of succinctness, I just jumped to a wrong conclusion here. I have just googled "learning from mistakes" and research apparently shows that it is harder than we think.[1]
- ↑ Learning From Mistakes Is Harder Than We Think, Time, accessed and archived on 12 June 2013 by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6HJn5lwzk
- --DancingPhilosopher (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think the "stub" tag should be removed from this article, so that it remains succinct and serves as an example of itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.129.148.114 (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Concision which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:10, 9 May 2026 (UTC)