Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Im sorry, but not every limited edition they do can be catalogued here. i would say, if they publish a work first, which is then published by a larger publisher, its notable. if they publish a short story or novella as an original work, not a reprint from a collection, its notable. but limited editions of works already published by larger publishers, thats commonplace. this is not to disparage their quality or editorial integrity, just their relative notability for our purposes.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Found this article again by chance. the lists of authors and illustrators should be removed, and replaced by the notable titles they have published, as i indicated above (ive added a few to start). novellas originally from a magazine are ok. definitive editions revised by the author, ok. the key is: are they taking a "chance" on a work being sellable as a stand alone book, or are they merely cashing in on a proven seller. whoever takes the risks gets the glory. reprints are wonderful, essential, necessary, but usually not notable.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
