Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23ca90ac9bf3014

Jump to content

Talk:Stuttgart kitchen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:08, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Stuttgart small kitchen"
"Stuttgart small kitchen"
  • Source: "It consisted of ... a moveable glass partition ... preventing the transmission of smells when this was necessary. Compared with the isolated kitchen of Frankfurt, and the Stuttgart model with its serving hatch, the moveable glass wall ... created a visual relationship with the dining room, so that children could be minded while one cooked." (Garrido, p. 156)
Created by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 241 past nominations.

Surtsicna (talk) 22:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC).Reply

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: No - I did not find the German names of Munich kitchen (Münchener Küche), Stuttgart small kitchen (Stuttgarter Kleinküche), and Stuttgart teaching kitchen (Stuttgarter Lehrküche) in the referenced sources, though they should be easy to find otherwise. Everything else has been verified.
  • Neutral: Yes
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Yes

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Both articles were created on nom day and sized at 1959 B (Munich) and 2194 B (Stuttgart). Image is PD in the US. Prefer ALT1 over ALT0/2 because cause-and-effect double hooks are more exceptional than differences (and also the parenthesis is placed in an ambiguous way). @Surtsicna: fix the issue and you're good to go; the names should be easy to find in RS. ミラP@Miraclepine 02:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sources added. Thank you for the detailed review, Miraclepine! Surtsicna (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Checked them; they check out! ミラP@Miraclepine 19:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply