Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
but are they bands that would later be regarded as britpop pioneers once the term became popular? If you do a search of google books in the 1980s you can see the term was used infrequently over the years to refer to a variety of things. I wonder if Robb was just the one of these that happened to be closest to the later popular use? JMiall₰08:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I vote the comment "His career at present consists of appearing as an opinionated talking head on TV list shows" stays (further to the recent edits). I made a sarcastic comment on this a while ago which was rightly deleted but putting it politely like this is acceptable, as it is all he is known to be doing these days. --Thoughtcat13:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
"Thoughtcat" is right. Maconie's boundless and seemingly inexhaustible endowment to these vexatious TV list shows needs to be acknowledged: why not here? This is, after all, his Wikipedia page. Above, Juux rightly states that Maconie also works at Radio 2 and 6 Music (already in the article), but as the list shows are seemingly an immense wedge of Maconie's oeuvre, why are they not included here? Maybe a fan of his (perhaps the man himself?) has removed them as they perhaps create the unwanted impression of Maconie as some kind of media whore.
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
Stuart's categorised as being a 1960 birth & as a person from Wigan. However in the first para, his DOB is given as 13/8/61 and his place of birth as Whiston. I know Whiston & Wigan are not that far apart but they are separate towns.
Stuart admits in his book "Pies and Prejudice" that he was born in Whiston Hospital for some unfathomable reason, but he has spent most of his life in Wigan. --138.253.45.18213:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Year of birth was originally given as 1960 as per imdb. Other more reliable sources give 1961, so article and cat have been corrected. Cjc13 (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
His DOB is now showing as 13/08/75, which surely can't be correct if he was working as a teacher in 1987. Clarification/correction anyone? GBev1987 (talk) 13:18, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Fascinating insights from the ever-charming Mr Waters, but hardly relevant to Maconie's career. I'd suggest deleting that paragraph. 31.221.203.58 (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I would agree that this has not affected his career, but it seems relevant, as Waters in notable and he is claiming Maconie was mistaken. I suppose it might belong in a "Criticism" section. It looks a bit too large in its current location? Perhaps it should be trimmed. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the reply. I guess it could occupy a new section, but I'm not sure that it merits one. I certainly agree that it could do with some pruning at the very least. (You could probably fill a book with RW's vexed score-settling comments, although I believe he's currently in the process of writing a memoir...) 31.221.203.58 (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your input, Martin. I agree that the full extent of Waters' attack on Maconie is excessive and can be cut down, but I would say it's relevant partly in the context of what the article already mentions, which is that Maconie has a history in his journalism of making stuff up. Rodericksilly (talk) 10:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply