Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22b98dc1b92725b

Jump to content

Talk:Stromata

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 71.163.117.143 in topic link rot

Untitled

[edit]

What is the date of publication or writing? Goldenrowley 06:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Date? Language? English translation?

[edit]

What language was it originally written in? When? Was it most common in Greek or Latin? The links on the bottom of the article say they are to English translations, but in fact, they are all in Latin. The editors deemed it proper not to print the English translation - Why?Jimhoward72 (talk) 10:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stromata as Third part in trilogy

[edit]

I do not believe it is accurate to characterize this work as part of a trilogy. "Because Clement refers in the opening of the Paedagogus to his intention to write a trilogy consisting of Protrepticus, Paedagogus, and Didasculus, and no work by the latter title is known, some earlier scholars considered the Stromateis to be the conclusion of this trilogy. This view is now rejected. No one considers Stromateis to follow the two earlier works in any kind of logical sequence." Heine, Ronald E. "The Alexandrians." The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature. Ed. Frances Young et al. Cambridge, 2004. 117-129. Print. Ocyril (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

The khazarzar link doesn't work 71.163.117.143 (talk) 01:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply