Talk:Strategic Airlift Capability
Add topic | Heavy Airlift Wing was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 30 September 2026 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Swedish share of airlift has been given to France in the context of Operation Serval (january 2013) as support from Sweden to French operation. (source http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/sv/Aktuellt/centralanyheter/Sverige-stodjer-med-transportflyg-till-Mali/)
Denmark withdrawing from NSAC
[edit]Jane's reported belatedly in Feb 08 that Denmark had "quietly" withdrawn from NSAC in late 2007. NATO has so far remained silent on the subject, the Danish Defence website makes no mention of it, and the Defence Press outside of Jane's has missed it. It's either not true (which is unlikely, Jane's ir most often correct) or great efforts are being made to keep the subject under wraps, perhaps for fear of compromising the whole project.Hudicourt (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Three or Four?
[edit]Just added link seems to say three total, not four. Hcobb (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
