Talk:Storm Management
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Storm Management article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge to correct name
[edit]Per their own webpage they never use Storm Models anywhere other than the url for their web page. Most places they use just the word "Storm" but for thier mailing address they give Storm Model Management. The other page under the correct name needs a lot of work, but this should then be merged into it. Doc ♬ talk 00:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Storm Model Management is their correct name Jennyacedaras 16:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
modelsobserver.com links
[edit]This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
- meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Scope of article
[edit]Is this article about models currently represented by this agency, or all models who have ever been represented? If the former, should there be a separate list for past models? If the latter, should there be separate sections for both? --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 13:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)