Talk:Stone Ghost

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. I have created a redirect from STONEGHOST to this article. Dekimasuよ! 11:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

---

The STONEGHOST network is rarely written as 'Stone Ghost' — Benefros (talk) 05:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Stone Ghost be renamed and moved to STONEGHOST:

• Oppose - STONEGHOST looks like an attempt to attract attention, or an acronym; it's also heard to read, since "HOST" pops out looking like part of the name. "Stone Ghost" is better. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 08:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:MOSTM: "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting 'official'." Parsecboy (talk) 11:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose Proposed name violates MOSTM. I don't see why the article even exists though. No sources, no evidence it's notable or even exists. TJ Spyke 15:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Project no longer exists.

FYI - This capability went away in 2018. 2601:145:8002:7390:30CB:6039:E774:376D (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)