Talk:Stolac

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stolac article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Bosnia and Herzegovina Mid‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Stolac is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Can those people that give estimated population numbers for Stolac please indicate their source as it would be good to verify the claims. Thank you.

Requested move

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

No consensus--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 15:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stolac Municipality → Stolac — Stolac (town) is a empty article, no need to split the article — Matthew_hk t c 09:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

- Oppose It is frequently necessary to split the articles for the town and the municipality. It is better to start off with the division, rather than try to separate them later after the articles have become confusing. Not that a good article about a municipality can't have a section about the town in it, but such ideal articles seldom stay that way and editors crowd the town into the lead at the expense of the municipality until the result is a unhelpful jumble. --Bejnar (talk) 04:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Merger proposal - Vidoski

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The result of this discussion is no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vidoski has had a proposed merger tag since September 2014 proposing a merger to this page, but this page was not similarly tagged. Vidoski is a one-line unfererenced stub article. I have placed a tag on this page and re-dated the tag at Vidoski to May 2017. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.