Talk:Stockholm

"Stockholm/S, Sweden" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stockholm/S, Sweden has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 26 § Stockholm/S, Sweden until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Architecture Section

The architecture section under culture is rather cluttered. I would like to fix it but as it needs a great deal of work, I figured I would check with others first. Please notify me if it collides with other intended edits. DaisyThePug (talk) 00:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

GNP - created where ?

90% of all Swedish Head Quarters are located at Stockholm. But is the GNP actually generated at the head-quaters ? Infact, Stockholm has never had any actual assets. No agricultural assets, no forest-assets, no mining assets, has never been a significant industrial city, nor having had a significant harbour. Head quarters only. But is it really there GNP is created ? 83.255.33.20 (talk) 20:28, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

'music' section

looks incomplete, like a couple of people have taken a run at it & then abandoned it. why is 'ace of base' missing?

I know they weren't from stockhom, but neither were roxette, strictly.

& there's some info duplicated on bergling, which just makes the article look sloppily written.

duncanrmi (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Karolinska Institute.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Avicii's suicide mention unnecessary

A note about Avicii as a musician, then suddenly mentioning his suicide with a semicolon, looks out of place there. @SergeWoodzing: decided to revert it and claimed it's not improvement. If we want to know someone died, it's definitely not an article about a city, but about him.

For the aforementioned user, try to read the paragraph and see if it flows smoothly. I'm not even sure if his death should be mentioned at all, as Roxette's lead singer is also dead and the band was also mentioned. People's death shouldn't be mentioned every time whenever they are named in a Wikipedia article. --Esperfulmo (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

I've already taken that, and several repetitions, out. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2026 (UTC)