Talk:Still Not Getting Any...

If I Die Tomorrow

They wrote the song and didn't like it, so Motley Crue used it for their album, "Red, White And Crue". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfinator-x (talk • contribs) 22:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

NOR

This article contains a large section describing each track. This section appears to violate Wikipedia's policy on original research. If nobody disagrees, I'm going to remove this whole section within the next couple of days. If you disagree, though, please feel free to speak up and indicate why this is not original work. --Yamla 23:40, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Describing each track by itself does not violate WP:NOR, and actually the descriptions look pretty honest to me. If you see a problem, your probably better off rewriting it then just using deletions. --unsigned comment from T-rex

Actually, I wrote this segment just previous to creating an account here. I felt/feel that describing each track on the album, (hopefully from a neutral standpoint) would give the reader a better idea of what the album, and by extension, the band, is like. You will note that for some of the descriptions, I used references to easy-to-find material, particularly from cannon sources such as the DVD special features from the Dual-Disc version of the album, and the Simple Plan website. I also included paraphrased comments that reflect professional reviews, such as the one linked to in the "overview box" (or whatever it's called), and reviews on [http://www.amazon.com Amazon.com]. If you wish, I can provide more obvious links to those as well. Although, there are a few small matters I feel must be rectified, particularly my rather thoughtless comment about The Matrix... edit time... Caligari 87 06:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Although I can see how much effort Caligari put into writing the song section, I could tell at an instant that it was POV and written by a fan.

It is way too favourable and I don't know if there is anyway to describe each song whilst also being neutral.

Just delete the whole thing. Why not have a "critical response" section instead, detailing the reception to the album on a whole, from a NPOV of course. --Rachel Cakes 06:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm open to that (EDIT: The rewrite). I tried to write from NPOV, but I admit I didn't do a good job, so I'd like to see it evened out a bit. But these kinds of things are quite imformative to me when I'm looking at music-related stuff; track-by-track breakdowns instead of a general overview. Please don't delete it. Let's try to make it better. Caligari 87 06:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I've seen this song by song type review for other albums and I like it. I think the best way to get it to be netral is to have a number of different people write up and edit the section --T-rex 15:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

the section describtion is just fine. In fact i think it is very informative. Perhaps what can be done is add a more diverse set of view to make it neutral instead of deleting it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.71.20 (talk) 13:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

name

whats the name of the album mean? SkaterBoy182 (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

title

Shouldn't the title of this article be "Still Not Getting Any…" with an ellipsis (…) instead of "Still Not Getting Any..." with three periods (...)? --Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

No, it shouldn't. There is no reason to use a special character in the page title if it is not necessary. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)