Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a242face1c8fcf79

Jump to content

Talk:Stiffness matrix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 61.18.56.229 in topic Stiffness matrix for other problems

Example

[edit]

The "example" on this page is just a random matrix with no explanation at all. It should be explained with further diagrams, or deleted. Napalm Llama (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

article rewrite

[edit]

I have rewritten this article to add more information and have a clearer exposition; the old version was a bit of a hodge-podge. Compsonheir (talk) 03:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Could use a simpler example first

[edit]

like the one with a linear arrangement of springs and masses used in Strang's Introduction to Applied Mathematics. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 03:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes !!! The present article explains the maths of stiffness matrices to those who already have higher maths - it is not at all accessible to most Wikipedia readers with a good general education - please can someone re-write it.

Stiffness matrix for other problems

[edit]

The equation should describe a relation between the solution variable and the right-hand side . In the form after an edit made earlier,

The left-hand side is a differential operator, while the right-hand side is a function. There is no way they can be equal to each other. Also, the original edit comment doesn't make sense. There is already a differential operator in the part. There is no reason why should appear twice. Therefore, I am reverting a previous edit to restore it to the correct form before that edit. -- 61.18.56.229 (talk) 09:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please also note that in the special case , is simply in the first section of this article. -- 61.18.56.229 (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply