Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a230fa68dc112877

Jump to content

Talk:Steve Howe Trio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 28bytes in topic Merge into the Steve Howe article?

Merge into the Steve Howe article?

[edit]

I think this paragraph would be better served being apart of the Steve Howe page. Under GTR and over Solo Work. An index of metals (talk) 23:40, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. The Trio isn't simply a solo project. It's a band in its own right, with a distinct style and significant contributions from the other performers, particularly Dylan Howe. It should be adequately covered in the main Steve Howe article, yes, but I feel a separate page just on the Trio is warranted too. Bondegezou (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
A standalone article would be nice, but right now I'm not sure there are enough third-party sources to support one. It was entirely unreferenced until I added the Classic Rock Magazine reference a few weeks ago, and even that one's pretty skimpy (just verifying who's in the band). Even allmusic doesn't have a standalone entry for the trio . If you can help me dig up some references for this, I think we'll have a stronger case for a standalone article. 28bytes (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply