Talk:Sterculiaceae
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I'm mystified by Berton's wholesale reversal of my edits to this article. I contributed new and factual information, with references, which he has deleted. I have tried to edit in such a way as to improve articles but Berton seems to consider this and other articles his personal property, which nobody else should be allowed to edit, improve, or critique in any way. MrDarwin 15:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Addendum
[edit]As a rather late addendum to the circumscription issues, I just got a copy of the new "Flowering Plant Families of the World" by Heywood et al. They maintain Malvaceae in a strict sense, but only by splitting the "core Malvales" rather finely into a series of smaller and narrowly defined families (Bombacaceae, Byttneriaceae, Brownlowiaceae, Durionaceae, Helicteraceae, Malvaceae, Pentapetaceae, Sparrmanniaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Tiliaceae); while the "traditional" core Malvalean families are recognized, they are defined by Heywood et al. much more narrowly than in traditional classifications. MrDarwin 16:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)