Talk:Stephan Ludwig Roth

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stephan Ludwig Roth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928021134/http://www.primariamedias.ro/index.php?id=496 to http://www.primariamedias.ro/index.php?id=496

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stephan Ludwig Roth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Apollo468 (talk · contribs) 19:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: JammyDodger357 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Jammy, and I am reviewing this article, Stephan Ludwig Roth. I must first applaud you on the quality of this article and the amount of effort that clearly went into this article, and your very impressive amount of skill and experience showcased here. I can in full confidence say that it easily passes the GA criteria. I also understand that it has been quite a while since you made this nomination, but I would still like to congratulate you on the effort. Below is the review, piece by piece.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is well-written, and of high quality, lending brief introduction to several areas to aid the reader's understanding.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   It is clear that this article was particularly well-researched and uses a wide range of reliable sources, while remaining free of any copyvio. Of particular note is the article's use of inline citations, which are used frequently and impressively.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It is a very long article, that pulls apart each part of his life and work, creating an in depth understanding of his life and viewpoints while not engaging in unnecessary tangents or information.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   It handles difficult topics, such as his antisemitic views, as well as his modern image as a liberal with confidence and care, creating a nuanced image with due proportion to each viewpoint.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   This article is well illustrated, with images that aid the reader's understanding, with appropriate captions explaining the connection.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall, this is an outstanding article, with clear effort and skill put into it, and I am happy to say that this is a GA.

While this easily passes the GA criteria, there are still levels above this. I believe that this article could become a featured article with a small amount of work, and I would greatly enjoy seeing you, or fellow editors, tackle that. Only 1 in 163 articles are GA, so it is a great achievement in any case.

- Jammy 18:37, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that after his 1849 execution, pastor Stephan Ludwig Roth became a "martyr" among the Transylvanian Saxons because of his advocacy of social justice?

• Source: Mall, Jonathan (2019). "Stephan Ludwig Roth und die Juden. Überlegungen zu einem vernachlässigten Aspekt im Denken des "größten Mannes des Sachsenvolkes"". Zeitschrift für Siebenbürgische Landeskunde (in German). 42: 63–81. ISSN 0344-3418. Retrieved 24 August 2025.

"Das Vermächtnis Stephan Ludwig Roths". Hermannstädter Zeitung. 2 October 1970. Retrieved 24 August 2025.

• • ALT1: ... that although the Transylvanian Saxon pastor Stephan Ludwig Roth admired the biblical Israelites and ancient Hebrews, he was openly antisemitic to contemporary Jews? Source: See multiple in "Views on Jews" section.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Abdurrahman Mohammad Fachir

Improved to Good Article status by Apollo468 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 116 past nominations.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC).