Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d25916e5ef485

Jump to content

Talk:Stave River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Skookum1 in topic Tidal Bore

Tidal Bore

[edit]

Is this a correct use of the term tidal bore (section: Terrain)? I am pretty certain that a tidal bore refers just to the wave-like phenomenon of a dramatic tide in its flood cycle, and not simply "the extend of tidal influence." Are there actual tidal bores on the lower fraser river? I've seen this usage crop up on other pages in the Vancouver area and believe this to be an incorrect usage of the term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keeldude (talkcontribs)

Yes, it is a correct usage; and a tidal bore on the Fraser and its tributaries the Pitt and the Stave is visible; the extend of tidal reach is the Mission Bridge. A tidal bore does not have to be "dramatic"; in the area of Ruskin, where the Stave enters the Fraser, I've seen a six-inch tidal bore; this would depend on the phase of the moon and the height of the river when in freshet or not. It's not an incorrect usage of the term; your definition is incorrect.Skookum1 (talk) 10:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply