Talk:Statute of autonomy
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Celia Homeford in topic Requested move 30 April 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 30 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Statute of Autonomy to Statute of autonomy. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 30 April 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Celia Homeford (talk) 14:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Statute of Autonomy → Statute of autonomy – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per MOS:CAPS, WP:AT. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Yep, looks like it is about the topic of such statutes rather than a specific statute, so not a proper noun and not capitalized on Wikipedia. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – How about a rationale or some data or something? Dicklyon (talk) 03:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Per SchreiberBike, this is about a type of law, not any specific law or the name of a law. It's like declaration of independence (or prime minister or senate). — BarrelProof (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support this is about such statutes generally. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.