Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40132928a89eddd

Jump to content

Talk:Statement on AI Extinction Risk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

merge into Existential risk from artificial general intelligence#Endorsement?

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Doesn't seem to merit a stand-alone article as of yet. Moorlock (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is a warning on the extinction of our own species signed by hundreds of their most influential individuals. Is it not enough to merit an article in an encyclopedia? Shouldn't we document our last steps? 139.47.115.24 (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think it certainly merits a paragraph or perhaps a subsection of Existential risk from artificial general intelligence. Moorlock (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
There have been a wide variety of reactions to the statement which the article could discuss. It could take a while to go through all the news articles about the statement and expand the article with such coverage, but it could be worthwhile. Enervation (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
If there is a lengthy discussion on public reception, it's probably better not to merge this article and to do it here. Existential risk from artificial general intelligence#Perspectives is already pretty long, and I would personally prefer to condense and organize the meaning than to add more opinions. But it's ok to detail here. Alenoach (talk) 22:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Enervation (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merge - This letter was and is a significant event in the history of AI, a major call for caution having immediate impact, as well as ripple effects we are still seeing, like yesterday's Senate bipartisan AI Insight Forum which was attended by some of the very persons who signed this letter. It stands strongly and proudly on its ownthat is, it is notable, and therefore deserves its own article. So, naturally, someone created a stub, and it will grow organically as articles are intended to on Wikipedia. Please do not bury it in a huge more general article. Sincerely,    The Transhumanist   08:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Shorter title?

[edit]

Am I missing something? Isn't the title "Statement on AI Risk". That's at the top of the page. It seems like only wp is using this longer title? 1Veertje (talk) 11:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@1Veertje: I have requested this move. –Gluonz talk contribs 18:36, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Edit the headline to match the actual letter.

[edit]

The headline should match the actual letter…Statement on AI Extinction Risk ~2026-47858-64 (talk) 20:50, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@~2026-47858-64: The letter appears to have been renamed recently. I changed the article title. –Gluonz talk contribs 21:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply