Talk:Stateless protocol
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
Opening heading
[edit]- I suggest to change "WWW server" to "HTTP server". This sharpens the comparison to the FTP server as both acryonyms are protocols. Plus the term "WWW server" is a fuzzier and possibly dated term. VdHamer (talk) 21:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- One can argue that cookies maintain extra state, thus changing the story of stateless servers, but cookies are stored on the client side rather than the server side. I would remove the reference to the role of cookies (or elaborate on this in more detail). VdHamer (talk) 21:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- What about https – the encryption code is a state, isn’t it? --Fritz Jörn (talk) 09:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Stateless server → Stateless protocol —
HTTP server is not an example of a stateless server, it may be stateful (see discussion) and modern WWW servers usually are stateful. It's the HTTP protocol that is stateless, indeed. Now, HTTP article contains a red link because it was incorrect to refer to stateless server when discussing a protocol. Because the concept of stateless server appears to be closely connected with statelessness of a protocol, I propose to rename and expand the article instead of making yet a new stub. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
@Maggyero: can you give us a description of the motivation for your recent edits. Things are reworded but it is not clear to me this an improvement or just changes. There are no edit summaries to help me. ~Kvng (talk) 15:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)