Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229c6a85d27910d

Jump to content

Talk:StarCraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Hog Farm in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleStarCraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
December 15, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
February 23, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
July 5, 2013Good topic removal candidateDemoted
July 4, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look at it and noticed the following:

  • There are some uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. While none of the paragraphs in "Story" need to be cited per WP:PLOTCITE, the "StarCraft II" paragraphs probably do need citations. There are also uncited statements at the end of some paragraphs (and I can add citation needed templates to those places if anyone is interested).
  • There are lots of one-sentence pargaraphs that should be merged with other content.
  • The plot summaries might be too long. Right now the plot section is over 1500 words, while WP:VG/CONTENT recommends a maximum of 700 words. I do not think every game and expansion needs as much information as present in the article about its plot.
  • The "Sales" section seems to be outdated and underdeveloped.
  • The "Starcraft" section in "Music" seems to be underdeveloped.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 04:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

There are some uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. While none of the paragraphs in "Story" need to be cited per WP:PLOTCITE, the "StarCraft II" paragraphs probably do need citations. There are also uncited statements at the end of some paragraphs (and I can add citation needed templates to those places if anyone is interested). There are lots of one-sentence pargaraphs that should be merged with other content. The plot summaries might be too long. Right now the plot section is over 1500 words, while WP:VG/CONTENT recommends a maximum of 700 words. I do not think every game and expansion needs as much information as present in the article about its plot. The "Sales" section seems to be outdated and underdeveloped. The "Starcraft" section in "Music" seems to be underdeveloped. Z1720 (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.